380.256 PEOPLE
| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Seuring, Stefan |
| |
| Nor Azizi, S. |
| |
| Pato, Margarida Vaz |
| |
| Kölker, Katrin |
| |
| Huber, Oliver |
| |
| Király, Tamás |
| |
| Spengler, Thomas Stefan |
| |
| Al-Ammar, Essam A. |
| |
| Dargahi, Fatemeh |
| |
| Mota, Rui |
| |
| Mazalan, Nurul Aliah Amirah |
| |
| Macharis, Cathy | Brussels |
|
| Arunasari, Yova Tri |
| |
| Nunez, Alfredo | Delft |
|
| Bouhorma, Mohammed |
| |
| Bonato, Matteo |
| |
| Fitriani, Ira |
| |
| Autor Correspondente Coelho, Sílvia. |
| |
| Pond, Stephen |
| |
| Okwara, Ukoha Kalu |
| |
| Toufigh, Vahid |
| |
| Campisi, Tiziana | Enna |
|
| Ermolieva, Tatiana |
| |
| Sánchez-Cambronero, Santos |
| |
| Agzamov, Akhror |
|
Fox, Charles
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (25/25 displayed)
- 2022Learning Pedestrian Social Behaviour for Game-Theoretic Self-Driving Cars
- 2022Extending Quantitative Proxemics and Trust to HRIcitations
- 2022Unfreezing autonomous vehicles with game theory, proxemics, and trustcitations
- 2021Space Invaders : Pedestrian Proxemic Utility Functions and Trust Zones for Autonomous Vehicle Interactionscitations
- 2021Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic : implications for automated vehiclescitations
- 2021Evaluating pedestrian interaction preferences with a game theoretic autonomous vehicle in virtual realitycitations
- 2020Continuous Game Theory Pedestrian Modelling Method for Autonomous Vehicles
- 2020Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: implications for automated vehiclescitations
- 2020Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: implications for automated vehiclescitations
- 2020Pedestrian Models for Autonomous Driving Part II: High-Level Models of Human Behaviorcitations
- 2020Examining Pedestrian-Autonomous Vehicle Interactions in Virtual Reality
- 2020Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic:implications for automated vehiclescitations
- 2020Investigation of Driver Route Choice Behaviour using Bluetooth Datacitations
- 2020Pedestrian Models for Autonomous Driving Part I: Low-Level Models, from Sensing to Trackingcitations
- 2020Space Invaders: Pedestrian Proxemic Utility Functions and Trust Zones for Autonomous Vehicle Interactionscitations
- 2019A heuristic model for pedestrian intention estimationcitations
- 2019From A Rocky Road to Smooth Sailingcitations
- 2019Use and citation of paper "Fox et al (2018), “When should the chicken cross the road? Game theory for autonomous vehicle - human interactions conference paper”" by the Law Commission to review and potentially change the law of the UK on autonomous vehicles. Cited in their consultation report, "Automated Vehicles: A joint preliminary consultation paper" on p174, ref 651.
- 2019Assessing Rural Accessibility and Rural Roads Investment Needs Using Open Source Datacitations
- 2019From A Rocky Road to Smooth Sailing:Building Transport Resilience to Natural Disasterscitations
- 2018Predicting pedestrian road-crossing assertiveness for autonomous vehicle control
- 2018Filtration analysis of pedestrian-vehicle interactions for autonomous vehicles control
- 2018Filtration analysis of pedestrian-vehicle interactions for autonomous vehicle control
- 2018When should the chicken cross the road?: Game theory for autonomous vehicle-human interactions
- 2018Models of human decision-making as tools for estimating and optimising impacts of vehicle automation
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|