| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Seuring, Stefan |
| |
| Nor Azizi, S. |
| |
| Pato, Margarida Vaz |
| |
| Kölker, Katrin |
| |
| Huber, Oliver |
| |
| Király, Tamás |
| |
| Spengler, Thomas Stefan |
| |
| Al-Ammar, Essam A. |
| |
| Dargahi, Fatemeh |
| |
| Mota, Rui |
| |
| Mazalan, Nurul Aliah Amirah |
| |
| Macharis, Cathy | Brussels |
|
| Arunasari, Yova Tri |
| |
| Nunez, Alfredo | Delft |
|
| Bouhorma, Mohammed |
| |
| Bonato, Matteo |
| |
| Fitriani, Ira |
| |
| Autor Correspondente Coelho, Sílvia. |
| |
| Pond, Stephen |
| |
| Okwara, Ukoha Kalu |
| |
| Toufigh, Vahid |
| |
| Campisi, Tiziana | Enna |
|
| Ermolieva, Tatiana |
| |
| Sánchez-Cambronero, Santos |
| |
| Agzamov, Akhror |
|
Vreeswijk, Jaap
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (16/16 displayed)
- 2023Paradigm Shift Beyond Business-As-Usual for Automated Road Transportation to Contribute to Climate-Neutral Smart Citiescitations
- 2023Remote Support for Automated Vehicle Operationscitations
- 2020Cooperative Automated Driving for managing Transition Areas and the Operational Design Domain (ODD)
- 2020TransAID Deliverable 8.2: Meta-analysis of the results
- 2020Enhanced Traffic Management Procedures of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Transition Areas
- 2020TransAID Deliverable 8.1: Stakeholder consultation report (final version)
- 2020TransAID Deliverable 9.5: TransAID Final Conference
- 2019TransAID Deliverable D2.1: Use cases and safety and efficiency metrics
- 2019TransAID Deliverable 9.4: TransAID Symposium
- 2019Enhanced Traffic Management Procedures in Transition Areas
- 2019TransAID Deliverable 8.1: Stakeholder consultation report (draft)
- 2019MAVEN Deliverable 7.2: Impact Assessment - Technical Report
- 2015Analysis of inertial choice behaviour based expected and experienced savings from a real-world route choice experimentcitations
- 2015COLOMBO Deliverable 6.3: Exploitation Plan
- 2014eCoMove: integration of results and conclusions
- 2014C-ITS implementation issues: barriers and possible solutions
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
report
TransAID Deliverable D2.1: Use cases and safety and efficiency metrics
Abstract
The main objective of this Deliverable 2.1 is to describe and identify the use cases where disruptions of traffic flow are expected to be most severe because of transitions between automation levels, and to identify KPIs to evaluate those use cases. For those identifications, a state of the art literature review has been conducted, a workshop was held with road authority stakeholders, advisory board members have been consulted and experts have been interviewed. The findings have been combined to identify the relevant aspects for TransAID scenarios and Transition of Control (ToC) in general. The large number of aspects (or dimensions) affecting automated vehicle behaviour and possible trigger conditions in combination with the many uncertainties regarding those aspects and conditions (e.g. what exactly triggers a ToC or Minimum Risk Manoeuvre?), posed a challenge for the use case and scenario definitions. Through brainstorming using a template based on above mentioned aspects and conditions, TransAID has identified five generic services that can be applied to many situations. Because of their generic characteristic, these services are expected to mitigate negative impacts resulting from vehicles in Transition Areas, regardless of the uncertainties (i.e. even if certain conditions are different, the solutions still apply). As a result, an overview was created of example situations where transition of control occurs regularly and causes traffic flow disruptions. By means of detailed services and use case descriptions, the deliverable gives a comprehensive overview on (negative) traffic safety and traffic efficiency impacts, for both urban, inter-urban and motorway situations, and proposes a preliminary set of (high-level) traffic measures.
Topics
Search in FID move catalog