| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Tekkaya, A. Erman |
| |
| Förster, Peter |
| |
| Mudimu, George T. |
| |
| Shibata, Lillian Marie |
| |
| Talabbeydokhti, Nasser |
| |
| Laffite, Ernesto Dante Rodriguez |
| |
| Schöpke, Benito |
| |
| Gobis, Anna |
| |
| Alfares, Hesham K. |
| |
| Münzel, Thomas |
| |
| Joy, Gemini Velleringatt |
| |
| Oubahman, Laila |
| |
| Filali, Youssef |
| |
| Philippi, Paula |
| |
| George, Alinda |
| |
| Lucia, Caterina De |
| |
| Avril, Ludovic |
| |
| Belachew, Zigyalew Gashaw |
| |
| Kassens-Noor, Eva | Darmstadt |
|
| Cho, Seongchul |
| |
| Tonne, Cathryn |
| |
| Hosseinlou, Farhad |
| |
| Ganvit, Harsh |
| |
| Schmitt, Konrad Erich Kork |
| |
| Grimm, Daniel |
|
Bulteau, Julie
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2023Encouraging carpooling for commuting in the Paris area (France): which incentives and for whom?citations
- 2023The impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on gendered mobility patterns in Francecitations
- 2022What is the potential impact of the transition from traditional transport to new mobility models (electric automated minibuses) in European cities?
- 2022The role of commuter rail accessibility in the formation of residential land values: exploring spatial heterogeneity in peri-urban and remote areascitations
- 2021Economic Assessment of Services with Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles: EASI-AVcitations
- 2021Encouraging carpooling for commuting in the Paris area (France): which incentives and for whom?citations
- 2021Modelling context-specific relationships between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and private car usecitations
- 2017Enhancing sustainable mobility through a multimodal platform: would travellers pay for it?citations
- 2015Potential demand for multimodal information. Evidence from the Plateau-de-Saclay
- 2014Revisiting the bottleneck congestion model by considering environmental costs and a modal policycitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Revisiting the bottleneck congestion model by considering environmental costs and a modal policy
Abstract
International audience ; This article attempts to internalize the negative external effects (congestion and pollution) generated by using cars, by considering the urban tax tool. To do this, we provide the development of a microeconomic model of this urban toll system, in order to minimize the total social cost. Two modes of transportation are taken into account: cars and public transport, the latter being considered nonpolluting. The total social cost includes (a) the costs generated by the two modes of transport, (b) the congestion costs, and we add (c) environmental costs generated by using cars. Based on Arnott, De Palma, and Lindsey (1990, 1993), who developed a bottleneck congestion model, three alternative tolls are compared: a fine toll, a coarse toll, and a uniform toll. Thus, several types of urban toll are investigated and we also add a modal policy, which redistributes the gains from urban tax to public transport. We analyze the implementation of an economic tool and a modal policy to achieve a social optimum. Finally, we highlight that the uniform toll provides the greatest impact on car traffic reduction but induces the highest total social cost. A coarse toll and a uniform toll reduce the social cost in comparison with a no-toll equilibrium. We also point out that adding a modal policy to the toll is successful in reducing the total social cost. Numerical simulations back up this theoretical analysis.
Topics
Search in FID move catalog