380.250 PEOPLE
People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Tekkaya, A. Erman |
| |
Förster, Peter |
| |
Mudimu, George T. |
| |
Shibata, Lillian Marie |
| |
Talabbeydokhti, Nasser |
| |
Laffite, Ernesto Dante Rodriguez |
| |
Schöpke, Benito |
| |
Gobis, Anna |
| |
Alfares, Hesham K. |
| |
Münzel, Thomas |
| |
Joy, Gemini Velleringatt |
| |
Oubahman, Laila |
| |
Filali, Youssef |
| |
Philippi, Paula |
| |
George, Alinda |
| |
Lucia, Caterina De |
| |
Avril, Ludovic |
| |
Belachew, Zigyalew Gashaw |
| |
Kassens-Noor, Eva | Darmstadt |
|
Cho, Seongchul |
| |
Tonne, Cathryn |
| |
Hosseinlou, Farhad |
| |
Ganvit, Harsh |
| |
Schmitt, Konrad Erich Kork |
| |
Grimm, Daniel |
|
Sochor, Jana
Chalmers University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (47/47 displayed)
- 2024Actualizing sustainable transport: the interplay between public policy instruments and shared mobility providers’ business modelscitations
- 2022From vision to reality: How service design processes shape Mobility as a Service offerings
- 2022Adopting Mobility-as-a-Service: An empirical analysis of end-users’ experiencescitations
- 2022Adopting Mobility-as-a-Service : An empirical analysis of end-users’ experiencescitations
- 2021Piecing Together the Puzzle: Mobility as a Service from the User and Service Design Perspectives
- 2021Deliverable 04: Application tools for use cases
- 2021Deliverable 03: State of the art and handbook tools for implementation
- 2020Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service – A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factorscitations
- 2020Intermediary MaaS Integrators: A case study on hopes and fearscitations
- 2019Adopting Mobility-as-a-Service: An empirical analysis of end-users’ experiences
- 2019Governing Mobility-as-a-Service: Insights from Sweden and Finlandcitations
- 2019A Gender Meta-Analysis of Transport Innovation Acceptance: Women Approve Change
- 2018Mobility as a Service: Development scenarios and implications for public transportcitations
- 2018Potential Customers of MaaS: A Swedish Baseline
- 2018Inviting travelers to the smorgasbord of sustainable urban transport: evidence from a MaaS field trialcitations
- 2018The European Roadmap 2025 for Mobility as a Service
- 2018Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Swedencitations
- 2018Inviting travelers to the smorgasbord of sustainable urban transport: Evidence from a MaaS field trial
- 2017Deliverable 2: European MaaS Roadmap 2025.
- 2017Creating Appropriate Trust in Automated Vehicle Systems: A Framework for HMI Designcitations
- 2017Mobility as a Service business and operator models
- 2017Procuring Mobility as a Service: Exploring dialogues with potential bidders in West Sweden
- 2017Mobility as a Service: Implications for future mainstream public transport
- 2017Mobility as a Service: Comparing Developments in Sweden and Finland
- 2017More Than the Sum of Its Parts? The Finnish Public’s Perspectives on Mobility-as-a-Service and ITS
- 2016State-of-the-art survey on stakeholders’ expectations for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS)
- 2016Business and operator models for MaaS:MAASiFiE Deliverable Nr 3
- 2016Vulnerable users' perceptions of transport technologiescitations
- 2016Developing the ‘Service’ in Mobility as a Service: experiences from a field trial of an innovative travel brokeragecitations
- 2016Creating Appropriate Trust for Autonomous Vehicle Systems: A Framework for HMI Design
- 2016Trying Out Mobility as a Service: Experiences from a Field Trial and Implications for Understanding Demandcitations
- 2016Future needs and visions for Mobility as a Service: Insights from European workshops
- 2016Institutional conditions for integrated mobility services (IMS): Towards a framework for analysis. K2 Working Papers 2016:16
- 2016Vulnerable Users’ Perceptions of Transport Technologiescitations
- 2016Deliverable 3: Business and operator models for Mobility as a Service (MaaS).
- 2016Trying on change – Trialability as a change moderator for sustainable travel behaviourcitations
- 2016To See or Not To See – The Effect of Object Recognition on Users’ Trust for "Automated Vehicles"
- 2016State-of-the-art survey on stakeholders' expectations for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): highlights from Europe
- 2016State-of-the-art survey on stakeholders’ expectations for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) – highlights from Europe
- 2015Implementing Mobility as a Servicecitations
- 2015Challenges in Integrating User, Commercial, and Societal Perspectives in an Innovative Mobility Service
- 2015An Innovative Mobility Service to Facilitate Changes in Travel Behavior and Mode Choice
- 2014The Reassuring Effects of ICT in Public Transportation: The Perspectives of Older Adults
- 2013Assessing the Benefits of Intelligent Truck Parkingcitations
- 2012Privacy in the Professional Drivers’ Workplace
- 2011Assessing the Benefits of Intelligent Truck Parking
- 2008Urban Mobility and Safety: ITS Technologies and Ethical Issues
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|