Mobility Compass

Discover mobility and transportation research. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Mobility Compass is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within mobility and transport research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

To Graph

8.271 Topics available

To Map

884 Locations available

467.600 PEOPLE
467.600 People People

467.600 People

Show results for 467.600 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 18704

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Serhiienko, Serhii
  • 2
  • 12
  • 0
  • 2023
Schmalz, Ulrike
  • 17
  • 39
  • 82
  • 2023
Oliveira, Marisa
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0
  • 2023
Ribeiro Pereira, Maria Teresa
  • 13
  • 61
  • 158
  • 2023
Bellér, Gábor
  • 2
  • 7
  • 1
  • 2023
Araujo, M.
  • 4
  • 19
  • 64
  • 2023
Frey, MichaelKarlsruhe
  • 28
  • 86
  • 203
  • 2023
Coutinho-Rodrigues, JoãoCoimbra
  • 39
  • 71
  • 1k
  • 2023
Wouters, Christian Guillaume LouiseAachen
  • 9
  • 47
  • 122
  • 2023
Kessel, Paul J. Van Van
  • 2
  • 4
  • 0
  • 2023
Árpád, István
  • 2
  • 7
  • 1
  • 2023
Fontul, Simona
  • 5
  • 15
  • 40
  • 2023
Kocsis, Dénes
  • 3
  • 7
  • 3
  • 2023
Cigada, AlfredoMilan
  • 2
  • 8
  • 217
  • 2023
Oort, Neils VanDelft
  • 92
  • 262
  • 1k
  • 2023
Agárdi, AnitaMiskolc
  • 7
  • 10
  • 20
  • 2023
Andrews, Gordon E.
  • 4
  • 17
  • 43
  • 2023
Sousa, Nuno
  • 10
  • 30
  • 64
  • 2023
Witlox, Frank Jacomina AlbertGhent
  • 234
  • 551
  • 7k
  • 2023
Dobruszkes, Frederic
  • 40
  • 69
  • 1k
  • 2023
Kiss, Judit T.
  • 2
  • 7
  • 1
  • 2023
Hadachi, AmnirSaint-Étienne-du-Rouvray
  • 36
  • 50
  • 104
  • 2023
Hamilton, Carl J.Kunovice
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2023
Misiura, Serhii
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2023
Schimpf, Marina
  • 2
  • 19
  • 0
  • 2023
Wouters, Christian Guillaume LouiseÁrpád, István

Kessel, Paul J. Van Van

  • Google
  • 2
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

  • aircraft
  • algorithm
  • optimisation
  • costs
  • implementation
  • maintenance
  • vehicle fleet
  • learning
  • health
  • intelligence
  • artificial intelligence
  • scheduling
  • autumn
  • uncertainty
  • timetable
  • airline
  • linear programming
  • maintenance practice
  • show -12 more
  • show less

Publications

  • 2023A Comparative Study of Optimization Models for Condition-Based Maintenance Scheduling of an Aircraft Fleetcitations
  • 2022Airline maintenance task rescheduling in a disruptive environmentcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tseremoglou, Iordanis
1 / 3 shared
Santos, Bruno Filipe
2 / 55 shared
Freeman, Floris C.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tseremoglou, Iordanis
  • Santos, Bruno Filipe
  • Freeman, Floris C.

article

A Comparative Study of Optimization Models for Condition-Based Maintenance Scheduling of an Aircraft Fleet

  • Tseremoglou, Iordanis
  • Kessel, Paul J. Van Van
  • Santos, Bruno Filipe
Abstract

Condition-based maintenance (CBM) scheduling of an aircraft fleet in a disruptive environment while considering health prognostics for a set of systems is a very complex combinatorial problem, which is becoming more challenging in light of the uncertainty included in health prognostics. This type of problem falls under the broad category of resource-constrained scheduling problems under uncertainty and is often solved using a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation. While a MILP framework is very promising, the problem size can scale exponentially with the number of considered aircraft and considered tasks, leading to significantly high computational costs. The most recent advances in artificial intelligence have demonstrated the capability of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms to alleviate this curse of dimensionality, as once the DRL agent is trained, it can achieve real-time optimization of the maintenance schedule. However, there is no guarantee of optimality. These comparative merits of a MILP and a DRL formulation for the aircraft fleet maintenance scheduling problem have not been discussed in the literature. This study is a response to this research gap. We conduct a comparison of a MILP and a DRL scheduling model, which are used to derive the optimal maintenance schedule for various maintenance scenarios for aircraft fleets of different sizes in a disruptive environment, while considering health prognostics and the available resources for the execution of each task. The quality of solutions is evaluated on the basis of four planning objectives, defined according to real airline practice. The results show that the DRL approach achieves better results with respect to scheduling of prognostics-driven tasks and requires less computational time, whereas the MILP model produces more stable maintenance schedules and induces less maintenance ground time. Overall, the comparison provides valuable insights for the integration of health prognostics in airline maintenance practice.

Topics
  • aircraft
  • algorithm
  • optimisation
  • costs
  • implementation
  • maintenance
  • vehicle fleet
  • learning
  • health
  • intelligence
  • artificial intelligence
  • scheduling
  • autumn
  • uncertainty
  • timetable
  • airline
  • linear programming
  • maintenance practice

Search in FID move catalog